Senin, 03 Agustus 2009

Microsoft: No browserless Windows 7 after all



It looks like there won't be a browserless version of Windows 7, after all।


Microsoft said late Friday that it won't ship the Windows 7 "E" version of Windows even though Europe has yet to sign off on its revised plan. The plan calls for the company to ship Windows 7 with Internet Explorer, but present a ballot screen in which users in Europe can decide whether they want Internet Explorer or another browser.

The software maker had originally proposed shipping Windows 7 in Europe without a browser at all--the so-called "E" version of the operating system. However, European regulators indicated that might not satisfy its concerns.

Microsoft announced last week that it was open to the "ballot screen," but said that it would wait to can the browserless "E" version until European regulators approved its plan.

The software maker said late Friday that it decided to ship the same version of Windows 7 for Europe after PC makers complained that having to use the browserless version of Windows 7 for a short period of time would be a pain.

"In the wake of last week's developments, as well as continuing feedback on Windows 7 E that we have received from computer manufacturers and other business partners, I'm pleased to report that we will ship the same version of Windows 7 in Europe in October that we will ship in the rest of the world," deputy general counsel Dave Heiner said in a statement.

The commission had said it "welcomed" Microsoft's move, also giving the software maker some confidence that it could ship Windows 7 with the browser included. If the commission accepts Microsoft's proposal, it will fully implement that proposed ballot screen to Windows 7 buyers in Europe.

"One reason we decided not to ship Windows 7 'E' is concerns raised by computer manufacturers and partners," Heiner said. "Several worried about the complexity of changing the version of Windows that we ship in Europe if our ballot screen proposal is ultimately accepted by the Commission and we stop selling Windows 7 'E'. Computer manufacturers and our partners also warned that introducing Windows 7 'E', only to later replace it with a version of Windows 7 that includes IE, could confuse consumers about what version of Windows to buy with their PCs."

The move also solved a challenge for Vista users in Europe, who under the previous plan would have had to do a clean install to move to Windows 7. It also allows Microsoft to sell an "upgrade version" of Windows 7 in Europe. Microsoft had previously said it would only sell a full version of the OS, though it had said it would sell that at the upgrade price, at least for a time.

Those who pre-ordered Windows 7 "E" through a recent discount offer will get the full version, as Microsoft had promised. However, Microsoft plans to now sell Windows 7 upgrades in Europe and also offer a higher-priced full version (for those without an earlier copy of Windows)--similar to what it is doing in the rest of the world.

The Firefox Campaign Trail: A Billion Downloads, A Billion Votes

According the Mozilla Team and the Firefox Twitter account, the spunky orange browser will reach 1 billion downloads at approximately 3:45 a.m. PT tomorrow morning. Because Microsoft's Internet Explorer is currently shipped on most Windows machines, IE still maintains its lead as supreme ruler in web browser land. But the very fact that Firefox requires users to recognize the existence of an alternative browser and actively install it, means that 1 billion downloads and 31% market share is a monumental feat।
According the Mozilla Team and the Firefox Twitter account, the spunky orange browser will reach 1 billion downloads at approximately 3:45 a.m. PT tomorrow morning. Because Microsoft's Internet Explorer is currently shipped on most Windows machines, IE still maintains its lead as supreme ruler in web browser land. But the very fact that Firefox requires users to recognize the existence of an alternative browser and actively install it, means that 1 billion downloads and 31% market share is a monumental feat.

Fill 'er up ... in space?



The panel reviewing NASA's long-range plans is giving a new boost to the old idea of setting up orbital fueling stations for spaceflight. If the space agency and the White House go down that route, it would mark a dramatic change in direction for future journeys beyond Earth orbit.

Some would say that's just what the nation's space effort needs.

The idea of setting up a permanent infrastructure for travel in deep space was floated on Thursday during a hearing in Cocoa Beach, Fla., conducted by the Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee.

Panel members who have been focusing on future travel beyond Earth orbit spoke favorably of the fuel-depot idea, and it's likely to appear as one of the options in a final report that's due by the end of August. It will be up to NASA and the White House to decide which option to pursue and how much money to spend. (The current ballpark figure is $80 billion over 10 years.)

Basically, here's how a fuel-depot system would change the spaceflight situation:

Spaceships currently have to carry all the fuel they'd need for an entire trip at once. That was the case for the Apollo-Saturn missions of the 1960s and the space shuttle missions of the past 28 years.

If fuel depots were built in orbit, however, spaceships coming up from Earth's "gravity well" could fill 'er up and continue their journey with a full tank of gas (or, say, liquid oxygen and hydrogen). Alternatively, you could design a different sort of transfer vehicle, optimized for making the trip from one orbital spaceport to another rather than launching and landing.

That would lighten the load for launch vehicles leaving Earth, since they wouldn't have to carry all the fuel for a long trip at once. And it might reduce the need to develop a new heavy-lift vehicle like the Ares V. You could get by instead with a smaller booster, launched empty and fueled up in orbit.

"It really is a game changer," Jeff Greason, chief executive officer of California-based XCOR Aerospace and a member of the review panel, was quoted as saying in a New York Times report on the hearing.

The idea has been floated before. As the Apollo program was winding down, planners at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama touched upon orbital fuel depots as a key piece of space infrastructure for deep-space flights. At the time, the space shuttle was little more than a twinkle in the space agency's eye.

"An orbital modular propellant storage depot, supplied periodically by the space shuttle or Earth-to-orbit fuel tankers, would be critical in making available large amounts of fuel to various orbital vehicles and spacecraft," NASA said in 1971. (The artwork above conceptualized how the system might look.)

NASA's space ambitions didn't pan out the way those planners planned. The cost of building the infrastructure for those deep-space trips was deemed too high, with too little payoff. As a result, no manned spacecraft has gone beyond Earth orbit since Apollo was shut down.

Five years ago, when President George W. Bush announced a new goal of returning to the moon by 2020, NASA turned to an "Apollo on steroids" approach that passed up orbital refueling. The plan did call for a maneuver that would link up moon-bound crews with their fueled-up transfer vehicles, however.

Now the Bush-era vision is being reviewed by Obama-era officials, and many of the previously laid plans are open for discussion again. Panel members laid out five scenarios for future trips beyond Earth orbit (which I previewed earlier this month):

  • Lunar base: Basically the current return-to-the-moon plan, which calls for setting up a permanent base.

  • Lunar global: No manned base, but a combination of quick visits to the moon ("sorties") plus robotic missions.

  • Moon to Mars: Lunar landings conducted primarily as rehearsals for Mars landings.

  • Mars first: Just focus on eventual Mars landings, don't return to the moon.

  • Flexible path: Start out by sending astronauts to platforms that are at stable points spread from Earth orbit to lunar orbit to Martian orbit (on Mars' moons, for example), plus near-Earth objects. Then send robots from those manned platforms to the surfaces of other worlds (down into the "gravity wells"). Don't send astronauts down onto the moon or Mars right off, but see how things go.

The last option sounds most conducive to the fuel-depot approach, and it also meshes best with the international space station's current role. In fact, Transterrestrial Musings' Rand Simberg suggests that using the space station as a fuel-depot test bed is such an attractive idea it might be worth the cost of changing the station's orbit.

Simberg also links to a host of other commentary about the panel hearing in general and the fuel-depot idea in particular. One of the best links goes to a white paper at Selenian Boondocks discussing how the concept could boost American industry and commercial space development. You'll find still more to sink your teeth into over at RLV and Space Transport News as well as the Space Coalition Blog.

For a skeptical view of the fuel-depot idea, check out Rob Coppinger's comments on the Hyperbola blog.

In addition to the "how" and "where" questions surrounding human spaceflight, the panel members took on the question of "why" - something we've talked about in the past. (You do remember the five E's, don't you?)

Here's how MIT aerospace professor Edward Crawley answered the "why" question during Thursday's hearing:

"Our ultimate objective should be viewed as the exploration and eventual extension of human civilization within the solar system. We have to keep our eye on the big prize. This will take a long time, but the time has come. The political alignment is here to allow this to be a goal for our nation, and it's a goal worthy of a great nation."

XCOR's Greason added a kicker to that comment, according to Irene Klotz's account for Discovery.com: "I know this sounds terribly ambitious and dramatic, but if that is not the point of human spaceflight … then what the hell are we doing?" Greason asked.

What the heck should we be doing in space? I'm going to be a bit out of the loop this weekend, discussing this subject and many others at the SpoCon science-fiction convention in Spokane - but if you leave a comment below, I'll try to add it to the mix as soon as I get a chance.

In Japan, Machines for Work and Play Are Idle




KITAKYUSHU, Japan — They may be the most efficient workers in the world। But in the global downturn, they are having a tough time finding jobs.

Japan’s legions of robots, the world’s largest fleet of mechanized workers, are being idled as the country suffers its deepest recession in more than a generation as consumers worldwide cut spending on cars and gadgets.

At a large Yaskawa Electric factory on the southern Japanese island of Kyushu, where robots once churned out more robots, a lone robotic worker with steely arms twisted and turned, testing its motors for the day new orders return. Its immobile co-workers stood silent in rows, many with arms frozen in midair.

They could be out of work for a long time. Japanese industrial production has plummeted almost 40 percent and with it, the demand for robots.

At the same time, the future is looking less bright. Tighter finances are injecting a dose of reality into some of Japan’s more fantastic projects — like pet robots and cyborg receptionists — that could cramp innovation long after the economy recovers.

“We’ve taken a huge hammering,” said Koji Toshima, president of Yaskawa, Japan’s largest maker of industrial robots.

Profit at the company plunged by two-thirds, to 6.9 billion yen, about $72 million, in the year ended March 20, and it predicts a loss this year.

Across the industry, shipments of industrial robots fell 33 percent in the last quarter of 2008, and 59 percent in the first quarter of 2009, according to the Japan Robot Association.

Tetsuaki Ueda, an analyst at the research firm Fuji Keizai, expects the market to shrink by as much as 40 percent this year. Investment in robots, he said, “has been the first to go as companies protect their human workers.”

While robots can be cheaper than flesh-and-blood workers over the long term, the upfront investment costs are much higher.

In 2005, more than 370,000 robots worked at factories across Japan, about 40 percent of the global total, representing 32 robots for every 1,000 manufacturing employees, according to a report by Macquarie Bank. A 2007 government plan for technology policy called for one million industrial robots to be installed by 2025. That will almost certainly not happen.

“The recession has set the robot industry back years,” Mr. Ueda said.

That goes for industrial robots and the more cuddly toy robots.

In fact, several of the lovable sort have already become casualties of the recession.

The robot maker Systec Akazawa filed for bankruptcy in January, less than a year after it introduced its miniature PLEN walking robot at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

Roborior by Tmsuk — a watermelon-shape house sitter on wheels that rolls around a home and uses infrared sensors to detect suspicious movement and a video camera to transmit images to absent residents — has struggled to find new users. A rental program was scrapped in April because of lack of interest.

Though the company won’t release sale figures, it has sold less than a third of the goal, 3,000 units, it set when Roborior hit the market in 2005, analysts say. There are no plans to manufacture more.

That is a shame, Mariko Ishikawa, a Tmsuk spokesman, says, because busy Japanese in the city could use the Roborior to keep an eye on aging parents in the countryside.

“Roborior is just the kind of robot Japanese society needs in the future,” Ms. Ishikawa said.

Japan’s aging population had given the development of home robots an added imperative. With nearly 25 percent of citizens 65 or older, the country was banking on robots to replenish the work force and to help nurse the elderly.

But sales of a Secom product, My Spoon, a robot with a swiveling, spoon-fitted arm that helps older or disabled people eat, have similarly stalled as caregivers balk at its $4,000 price.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries failed to sell even one of its toddler-size home-helper robots, the Wakamaru, introduced in 2003.

Of course, less practical, novelty robots have fallen on even harder times in the downturn. And that goes for robot makers outside Japan, too.

Ugobe, based in Idaho, is the maker of the cute green Pleo dinosaur robot with a wiggly tail; it filed for bankruptcy protection in April.

Despite selling 100,000 Pleos and earning more than $20 million, the company racked up millions of dollars in debt and was unable to raise further financing.

Sony pulled the plug on its robot dog, Aibo, in 2006, seven years after its introduction. Though initially popular, Aibo, costing more than $2,000, never managed to break into the mass market.

The $300 i-Sobot from Takara Tomy, a small toy robot that can recognize spoken words, was meant to break the price barrier. The company, based in Tokyo, has sold 47,000 since the i-Sobot went on sale in late 2007, a spokeswoman, Chie Yamada, said, making it a blockbuster hit in the robot world.

But with sales faltering in the last year, the company has no plans to release further versions after it clears out its inventory of about 3,000.

Kenji Hara, an analyst at the research and marketing firm Seed Planning, says many of Japan’s robotics projects tend to be too far-fetched, concentrating on humanoids and other leaps of the imagination that cannot be readily brought to market.

“Japanese scientists grew up watching robot cartoons, so they all want to make two-legged companions,” Mr. Hara said. “But are they realistic? Do consumers really want home-helper robots?”

Robot Factory, once a mecca for robot fans in the western city of Osaka, closed in April after a plunge in sales. “In the end,” said Yoshitomo Mukai, whose store, Jungle, took over some of Robot Factory’s old stock, “robots are still expensive, and don’t really do much.”

Of course, that is not true for industrial robots — at least not when the economy is booming.

Fuji Heavy Industries argues its robots are practical and make economic sense. The company sells a giant automated cleaning robot that can use elevators to travel between floors on its own. The wheeled robot, which resembles a small street-cleaning car, already works at several skyscrapers in Tokyo.

Companies can recoup the 6 million yen investment in the cleaner robot in as quickly as three years, a Fuji spokesman, Kenta Matsumoto, said. The manufacturer has rented out about 50 so far.

“A robot will work every day and night without complaining,” Mr. Matsumoto said. “You can even save on lights and heating, because robots don’t need any of that.”

Makiko Inoue contributed reporting from Tokyo.

Apple Seals iPhone's SMS Security Leak



Could something as simple as an SMS More about SMS text message turn your own smartphone against you, allowing a hacker to listen in on your private conversations or direct you to a malicious Web site?

It can be done, according to security experts presenting their findings Thursday at the Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas.

News of the now exposed flaw generated quite a buzz, especially because the researchers said they had notified Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) Apple Store Discount on Office 2008 for Mac - Home and Student Edition . Click here. More about Apple about the iPhone's susceptibility to the attack, but the vendor had not released a fix at the time it was revealed at the conference.

However, the iPhone maker on Friday rushed out with an iPhone OS update that it says addresses the flaw.

Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG) More about Google Android operating system is also affected by an SMS flaw, but the Internet search giant has fixed it.

The danger of SMS flaws is that they let attacks spread widely very fast and have the potential to take phishing and cyberfraud to new heights.

News of the iPhone SMS Flaw

At Black Hat, Charlie Miller, a researcher from Independent Security Evaluators, and University of Berlin Ph.D. candidate Collin Mulliner demonstrated that hackers can break into an iPhone through the SMS protocol to launch a denial of service (DoS) attack or take control of a user's device.

They showed that hackers can launch malware attacks through a victim's iPhone or implement other types of attacks common in the PC world, such as installing information-stealing Trojans.

That's because smartphones, with their flash memory, operating systems and other capabilities, are essentially very small computers. iPhone hackers and crackers have been able to turn the phone into what could arguably be called a desktop. The Java-based Open Office suite can be ported to the iPhone and, because the iPhone has a connector on its base for video output, it can be hooked up to a large screen. Add a keyboard, and you have a computer with at least 16 GB of disk space, 128 MB of RAM and a 600 MHz processor that can run any Linux application.

Miller, who formerly worked at the National Security Agency, released the first remote exploit for the iPhone back in 2007 and has made a career out of breaking Apple's security. He made it to Popular Mechanics' Top 10 Hackers list in 2008.

Apple Issues Update

The duo publicized the flaw at Black Hat because Apple did not initially respond to their requests to fix it, they said.

On Friday, after news of the attack had been widely reported, Apple introduced iPhone OS 3.0.1, which it claims patches the SMS flaw.

Apple's exclusive carrier in the U.S., AT&T (NYSE: T) More about AT&T, said it's working hard to maintain security. "AT&T takes all security threats seriously, and we have controls and mitigation capabilities in place that block and identify attempts to breach the security of our network," spokesperson Jeannie Hornung told TechNewsWorld.

iPhone Users Upset

News of the flaw sparked the creation of a topic on how to disable SMS on Apple's iPhone forum.

"In light of the recently announced hack of iPhone's SMS, I'd like to turn the feature completely," dan-the-red wrote on the forum. "Once there's a permanent solution ... well, I'd like to leave it off. Frankly, I can't stand it. How can I kill it, short of turning off the iPhone?"

What Is SMS and Why Is It Flawed?

SMS, part of the GSM series of standards, uses standardized communication protocols to let mobile phone users send and receive messages of up to 160 characters.

GSM has several vulnerabilities, some of which carry over into SMS. However, SMS has additional vulnerabilities because of its store-and-forward feature and because it can be conducted over the Internet.

Back in 2005, researchers at Pennsylvania State University presented a paper on SMS' vulnerabilities at the 12th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security.

Titled "Exploiting Open Functionality in SMS-Capable Cellular Networks," this paper said that connections between mobile phones and the Internet through SMS could let hackers kill voice service to large metropolitan areas with a cable modem. The hackers could target the entire United States with a medium-sized zombie network.

SMS traffic can be used to create a denial-of-service (DoS) attack by simply sending enough of them to flood control channels. "It would be theoretically possible to knock out cellular service for the continent with a data rate of approximately 370 Mbps," the paper stated.

The Danger of Thinking Big

Hackers have not launched wide-scale attacks through SMS so far perhaps because they would first have to collect data on the phones available in a given area. However, that can be done over the Internet.

"Evidently, the bad guys haven't been able to figure out how to do it effectively yet," Randy Abrams, director of technical education at security vendor ESET, told TechNewsWorld.

However, when the hackers do figure it out -- if they manage to work around the patch Apple delivered -- it could be big trouble. "The iPod touch and iPhone share the same operating system, so if I can infect your iPhone and use it to infect all other iPhones in your address book, that could spread like wildfire," Carl Howe, director, anywhere consumer research at the Yankee Group, told TechNewsWorld.

The iPod touch would be a good vector to help spread the infection because it uses WiFi and can drop off the network after pulling or sending malware. Yankee's research shows there are more than 40 million iPhones and iPod touches worldwide.

"This could parallel the swine flue pandemic with the rapidity of its spread," Howe said.

Google Plugs the Leak

The Android operating system also suffered from an SMS flaw, but it's different from the Apple flaw, according to Android security engineer Rich Cannings.

The Android flaw would let attackers temporarily knock mobile phones off the cell network but would not let them gain control of the devices, Cannings told TechNewsWorld.

Miller and Mulliner had notified Google about the flaw at the end of June, and Google fixed it within days, Cannings said. "We made the fix available to carriers and OEMs for use in updating their customers, and have updated open source Android," he added.

Android users who update their systems will see that the update includes a security fix.

Taking CyberFraud to the Max

Security fixes are essential because SMS spoofing could take cyberfraud to new heights, ESET's Abrams warned.

"I just got an e-mail from a stranger claiming she's stranded in London and has lost her wallet and passport and asking me to send her money," he said. Such messages are a common tactic for scammers who break into a victim's email account and then steal money from that person's friends.

"That sort of fraud will be even more effective on cellphones than it is on e-mail when it appears to come from your friend, because people trust their cellphone messages even more than they trust e-mail," he said.